1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
tough one, even for me)
2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
of what I would like to see though)
3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
be caused by one.
5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nbc7d.17092$kq6.10553690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> 1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
> tough one, even for me)
I was gonna pick Jamie Mac as the highest finishing non-Chaser,
but DJ’s average finish at Dega was too compelling.
Of course there is something to be said for a Hot Driver, eh?
> 2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
> of what I would like to see though)
> 3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
Julia, didja change yore name?
As in–Shirley u jest?
Those Chasers got it done in the previous 26 races & will ‘continue’
to get er done in the last 10 races.
> 4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
> be caused by one.
U forgot to prognosticate a Bonus Prediction.
For a +5, who is gonna be the precipitator of the Big One?
> 5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
> better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
Cru-confoozed
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:30:24 CST, "Crusader" <cr…@comcast.net>
wrote:
>> 5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>> better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
>Cru-confoozed
Dear Cru-zer,
She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
their own teammates who did make the chase.
She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
prediction.
Let’s see, the teams in the Chase are:
Hendricks (& Gordon)
Roush
Yates
DEI
Evernham
Penske
Gibbs
(I’m counting JJ as a Hendricks car for Julia’s bet.)
Marty
"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote …
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> "Crusader" wrote:
>>> 5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>> better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
>>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
>>Cru-confoozed
> Dear Cru-zer,
> She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
> their own teammates who did make the chase.
> She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
> prediction.
the "as well" part confoozes me! Predicting a tie, IMO, would elevate this to a
Bonus pick.
Crusader wrote:
> "Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nbc7d.17092$kq6.10553690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
>>1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
>>tough one, even for me)
> I was gonna pick Jamie Mac as the highest finishing non-Chaser,
> but DJ’s average finish at Dega was too compelling.
> Of course there is something to be said for a Hot Driver, eh?
well, I kinda just put it there outta being on his bandwagon and all…
realistically, I don’t have my hopes as high as they have been other weeks.
If "hot" = on a tear, then yeah that gives me a little more hope….
If "hot" = "hawt, then I dunno ~ his looks haven’t gotten him into
victory lane yet but it may help as far as strengthening his fanbase ~ I
plead the 5th…
>>2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
>>of what I would like to see though)
>>3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
> Julia, didja change yore name?
> As in–Shirley u jest?
> Those Chasers got it done in the previous 26 races & will ‘continue’
> to get er done in the last 10 races.
LOL…. I just figured this would be the one race where the cream may
not necessarily rise to the top… anything can happen when the
difference between 1st and 25th can be a blink of an eye and I’m not
sure it how much the chase is gonna play into finding drafting partners
to help keep them in the top few cars.
>>4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
>>be caused by one.
> U forgot to prognosticate a Bonus Prediction.
> For a +5, who is gonna be the precipitator of the Big One?
okay…. lemmme see… I think I’ll go with Jeff Green.
>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
> Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
> Cru-confoozed
LOL… yeah, that was kinda confusing "women talk"… Marty did good
‘splaining it…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
WildWeasel wrote:
> "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" wrote …
>> "Crusader" wrote:
>>>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
>>>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
>>>Cru-confoozed
>>Dear Cru-zer,
>>She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
>>their own teammates who did make the chase.
>>She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
>>prediction.
> the "as well" part confoozes me! Predicting a tie, IMO, would elevate this to a
> Bonus pick.
LOL… I dunno… the way NASCAR has been playing with the rules it may
not be that far off…. but I could always use the "as well" part if a
non chase teammate finishes a spot behind his chase teammate but earns
more points because of laps lead bonuses…. well, I would at least try
sneaking that by…
Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:30:24 CST, "Crusader" <cr…@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
>>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
>>Cru-confoozed
> Dear Cru-zer,
> She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
> their own teammates who did make the chase.
> She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
> prediction.
> Let’s see, the teams in the Chase are:
> Hendricks (& Gordon)
> Roush
> Yates
> DEI
> Evernham
> Penske
> Gibbs
> (I’m counting JJ as a Hendricks car for Julia’s bet.)
> Marty
can I hire you as my official interpreter…. you’re good…
yeah, I was kinda thinking JJ would be Hendrick…. Kenseth would be
Roush… etc.
Julia ~ (or you can just call me "Shirley")
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xCy7d.25023$kq6.14287064@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:30:24 CST, "Crusader" <cr…@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> >>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
> >>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN,
etc…)
> >>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
> >>Cru-confoozed
> > Dear Cru-zer,
> > She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
> > their own teammates who did make the chase.
> > She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
> > prediction.
> > Let’s see, the teams in the Chase are:
> > Hendricks (& Gordon)
> > Roush
> > Yates
> > DEI
> > Evernham
> > Penske
> > Gibbs
> > (I’m counting JJ as a Hendricks car for Julia’s bet.)
> > Marty
> can I hire you as my official interpreter…. you’re good…
> yeah, I was kinda thinking JJ would be Hendrick…. Kenseth would be
> Roush… etc.
> Julia ~ (or you can just call me "Shirley")
You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing in
front of JJ but behind JG, point or no? If he finishes in front of both of
them, point for sure. Well, at least one of 3 contributions you need to
make your point. :-)
DJ finishing in front of ES, clearly a yes. That’s what you’re talking
about right?
-Russ.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Vwy7d.25009$kq6.14275956@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> Crusader wrote:
> > "Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message news:nbc7d.17092$kq6.10553690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> >>1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
> >>tough one, even for me)
> > I was gonna pick Jamie Mac as the highest finishing non-Chaser,
> > but DJ’s average finish at Dega was too compelling.
> > Of course there is something to be said for a Hot Driver, eh?
> well, I kinda just put it there outta being on his bandwagon and all…
> realistically, I don’t have my hopes as high as they have been other weeks.
> If "hot" = on a tear, then yeah that gives me a little more hope….
> If "hot" = "hawt, then I dunno ~ his looks haven’t gotten him into
> victory lane yet but it may help as far as strengthening his fanbase ~ I
> plead the 5th…
I thot u would catch on to the double entendre
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> >>2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
> >>of what I would like to see though)
> >>3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
> > Julia, didja change yore name?
> > As in–Shirley u jest?
> > Those Chasers got it done in the previous 26 races & will ‘continue’
> > to get er done in the last 10 races.
> LOL…. I just figured this would be the one race where the cream may
> not necessarily rise to the top… anything can happen when the
> difference between 1st and 25th can be a blink of an eye and I’m not
> sure it how much the chase is gonna play into finding drafting partners
> to help keep them in the top few cars.
Good thinking on the potential for the cream to go to the bottom at Dega!
> >>4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
> >>be caused by one.
> > U forgot to prognosticate a Bonus Prediction.
> > For a +5, who is gonna be the precipitator of the Big One?
> okay…. lemmme see… I think I’ll go with Jeff Green.
Hey, i’m 2fer2 in reminding folks to go for the Big Bonus!
> >>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
> >>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
> > Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
> > Cru-confoozed
> LOL… yeah, that was kinda confusing "women talk"… Marty did good
> ‘splaining it…
Our resident interpreter
CRU
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:02:08 CST, "Somebody"
<someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote:
>You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing in
>front of JJ but behind JG, point or no?
I’d give her the point. I think for all practical purposes, JJ is
driving a "Hendricks" car, even though it is technically the
only car in the Jeff Gordon stable.
>DJ finishing in front of ES, clearly a yes. That’s what you’re talking
>about right?
Yes, that’s the basic idea of her bet.
Marty
"Somebody" <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote in
news:opz7d.75352$vO1.413471@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
> You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing
> in front of JJ but behind JG, point or no? If he finishes in front of
> both of them, point for sure. Well, at least one of 3 contributions
> you need to make your point. :-)
Are you trying to include Nemechek as a Hendrick car? I don’t think
that’s reasonable, all they do is lease motors from Hendrick. I
wouldn’t consider Joe as Johnson’s or Gordon’s teammate.
If you’re just trying to score between Johnson & Gordon, I would
say that’s a zero..comparing two chase drivers. Only comparisons
between Johnson & Labonte/Vickers or between Gordon & Labonte/
Vickers seem meaningful to me.
There’s a few others that are a tad shakey in terms of "teammate"s:
K Wallace – Earnhardt teammate or not? Nominally he’s in Waltrip’s
car, but Mikey didn’t have a #00 ready, so he’s in a DEI #1. I say
he’s an Earnhardt teammate.
Gaughn – Newman teammate or not? Penske is part owner of the #77,
I say he’s a Newman teammate.
Rudd – Kenseth/Busch teammate or not? As far as I know, the Woods’
collaboration with Rousch is now over – their engines come from
Yates (like all the Ford teams) and they’re building their own cars.
I say not a teammate to Kenseth/Busch.
H Sadler – E Sadler teammate or not? Hermie leased a car & engine
from Yates, but it’s still his team. I say they’re just brothers,
not teammates.
Craven – Stewart teammate or not? Even tho this is a one-off deal,
as far as I know it’s Gibbs all the way, so I say he’s a teammate
to Stewart.
John
"John McCoy" <igop…@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9576A80483D07pogonewsguy@129.250.170.82…
> "Somebody" <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote in
> news:opz7d.75352$vO1.413471@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
> > You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing
> > in front of JJ but behind JG, point or no? If he finishes in front of
> > both of them, point for sure. Well, at least one of 3 contributions
> > you need to make your point. :-)
> Are you trying to include Nemechek as a Hendrick car? I don’t think
> that’s reasonable, all they do is lease motors from Hendrick. I
> wouldn’t consider Joe as Johnson’s or Gordon’s teammate.
My bad, I was thinking of Brian Vickers the 25 car, not sure why I said
Joe — did he used to drive that car maybe?
> If you’re just trying to score between Johnson & Gordon, I would
> say that’s a zero..comparing two chase drivers. Only comparisons
> between Johnson & Labonte/Vickers or between Gordon & Labonte/
> Vickers seem meaningful to me.
> There’s a few others that are a tad shakey in terms of "teammate"s:
> K Wallace – Earnhardt teammate or not? Nominally he’s in Waltrip’s
> car, but Mikey didn’t have a #00 ready, so he’s in a DEI #1. I say
> he’s an Earnhardt teammate.
I agree, he’s a DEI team car today.
> Gaughn – Newman teammate or not? Penske is part owner of the #77,
> I say he’s a Newman teammate.
Don’t know on that one.
> Rudd – Kenseth/Busch teammate or not? As far as I know, the Woods’
> collaboration with Rousch is now over – their engines come from
> Yates (like all the Ford teams) and they’re building their own cars.
> I say not a teammate to Kenseth/Busch.
I agree, no teammate.
> H Sadler – E Sadler teammate or not? Hermie leased a car & engine
> from Yates, but it’s still his team. I say they’re just brothers,
> not teammates.
Agreed, not teammates.
> Craven – Stewart teammate or not? Even tho this is a one-off deal,
> as far as I know it’s Gibbs all the way, so I say he’s a teammate
> to Stewart.
Sure, why not.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Somebody wrote:
> "Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xCy7d.25023$kq6.14287064@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
>>Martin X. Moleski, SJ wrote:
>>>On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:30:24 CST, "Crusader" <cr…@comcast.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>>>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN,
> etc…)
>>>>Hey Marty u wanna ‘splain this one?
>>>>Cru-confoozed
>>>Dear Cru-zer,
>>>She’s betting that at least three non-chasers will finish ahead of
>>>their own teammates who did make the chase.
>>>She’s given three pairs as an example, not as a specific
>>>prediction.
>>>Let’s see, the teams in the Chase are:
>>>Hendricks (& Gordon)
>>>Roush
>>>Yates
>>>DEI
>>>Evernham
>>>Penske
>>>Gibbs
>>>(I’m counting JJ as a Hendricks car for Julia’s bet.)
>>>Marty
>>can I hire you as my official interpreter…. you’re good…
>>yeah, I was kinda thinking JJ would be Hendrick…. Kenseth would be
>>Roush… etc.
>>Julia ~ (or you can just call me "Shirley")
> You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing in
> front of JJ but behind JG, point or no? If he finishes in front of both of
> them, point for sure. Well, at least one of 3 contributions you need to
> make your point. :-)
> DJ finishing in front of ES, clearly a yes. That’s what you’re talking
> about right?
> -Russ.
yep, I see the confusion here. I would consider any non chase teammate
finishing above a chase teammate counting towards the point even if
there is another chase teammate that finished ahead of both of them….
so, using your example, if Vickers finished above Johnson but behind
Gordon it would count as a match. In order to kinda balance that out, I
wont count any driver more than once (ie. I wouldn’t count Vickers and
T. Labonte both finishing above Johnson as two matches, nor will I count
Vickers finishing ahead of both Johnson and Gordon as two matches)….
okay, that sounds kinda confusing even to me… hey Marty ~ if you are
around this morning, could you clarify my thoughts for me???…
Julia ~
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
John McCoy wrote:
> "Somebody" <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote in
> news:opz7d.75352$vO1.413471@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
>>You’ve got a tricky one with, say Hendrick… Front Roe Joe finishing
>>in front of JJ but behind JG, point or no? If he finishes in front of
>>both of them, point for sure. Well, at least one of 3 contributions
>>you need to make your point. :-)
> Are you trying to include Nemechek as a Hendrick car? I don’t think
> that’s reasonable, all they do is lease motors from Hendrick. I
> wouldn’t consider Joe as Johnson’s or Gordon’s teammate.
> If you’re just trying to score between Johnson & Gordon, I would
> say that’s a zero..comparing two chase drivers. Only comparisons
> between Johnson & Labonte/Vickers or between Gordon & Labonte/
> Vickers seem meaningful to me.
> There’s a few others that are a tad shakey in terms of "teammate"s:
> K Wallace – Earnhardt teammate or not? Nominally he’s in Waltrip’s
> car, but Mikey didn’t have a #00 ready, so he’s in a DEI #1. I say
> he’s an Earnhardt teammate.
> Gaughn – Newman teammate or not? Penske is part owner of the #77,
> I say he’s a Newman teammate.
> Rudd – Kenseth/Busch teammate or not? As far as I know, the Woods’
> collaboration with Rousch is now over – their engines come from
> Yates (like all the Ford teams) and they’re building their own cars.
> I say not a teammate to Kenseth/Busch.
> H Sadler – E Sadler teammate or not? Hermie leased a car & engine
> from Yates, but it’s still his team. I say they’re just brothers,
> not teammates.
> Craven – Stewart teammate or not? Even tho this is a one-off deal,
> as far as I know it’s Gibbs all the way, so I say he’s a teammate
> to Stewart.
> John
yeah, I can see how this can be shaky ground too… I will list what I
consider to be teammates for the record… if there are any big
objections I will remove them from the list:
Hendrick = #5, #24, #25, #48
DEI = #1, #8, #15
JGR = #18, #20
Evernham = #9, #19
Penske = #2, #12, #77
Yates = #38, #88
Roush = #6, #16, #17, #97, #99
I think that accounts for all of the teams with cars in the Chase… I’m
sure someone will correct me if I am wrong…
Julia ~
"Julia" wrote …
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
>>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or better
>>>than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN, etc…)
> yep, I see the confusion here. I would consider any non chase teammate
> finishing above a chase teammate counting towards the point even if there is
> another chase teammate that finished ahead of both of them…. so, using your
> example, if Vickers finished above Johnson but behind Gordon it would count as
> a match. In order to kinda balance that out, I wont count any driver more
> than once (ie. I wouldn’t count Vickers and T. Labonte both finishing above
> Johnson as two matches, nor will I count Vickers finishing ahead of both
> Johnson and Gordon as two matches)…. okay, that sounds kinda confusing even
> to me… hey Marty ~ if you are around this morning, could you clarify my
> thoughts for me???…
I’d count both your above examples. Each event, Vickers finishing above JJ and
TLab finishing above JJ would be independent of each other and, IMO, count as 2
towards your 3. Same with BV finishing above JJ and JG, I’d say that’s 2.
If BV and TLab both finish above JJ and JG … you’re golden! (and there’s a
meeting Monday AM at HMS!)
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message news:CYS7d.28301$kq6.17830255@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> John McCoy wrote:
> > "Somebody" <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote in
> > news:opz7d.75352$vO1.413471@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
CRUsnip to:
> yeah, I can see how this can be shaky ground too… I will list what I
> consider to be teammates for the record… if there are any big
> objections I will remove them from the list:
> Hendrick = #5, #24, #25, #48
> DEI = #1, #8, #15 CRU-maybe add #133 Kerry Earnhardt in RCR car?
> JGR = #18, #20 CRU-add #11-Craven
> Evernham = #9, #19
> Penske = #2, #12, #77 CRU-add #06 Chad Blount
> Yates = #38, #88 CRU-add #02 Hermie Sadler in a Yoush Ford Engine
> Roush = #6, #16, #17, #97, #99 CRU-add #21 still
> I think that accounts for all of the teams with cars in the Chase… I’m
> sure someone will correct me if I am wrong…
> Julia ~
On 3 Oct 2004 13:15:01 GMT, Julia <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would consider any non chase teammate
>finishing above a chase teammate counting towards the point even if
>there is another chase teammate that finished ahead of both of them….
>so, using your example, if Vickers finished above Johnson but behind
>Gordon it would count as a match. In order to kinda balance that out, I
>wont count any driver more than once (ie. I wouldn’t count Vickers and
>T. Labonte both finishing above Johnson as two matches, nor will I count
> Vickers finishing ahead of both Johnson and Gordon as two matches)….
>okay, that sounds kinda confusing even to me… hey Marty ~ if you are
>around this morning, could you clarify my thoughts for me???…
Nope. The race is over. I’ll bet you get the point no matter how
you slice it. 7 Chasers not in the Top 10 gives you very fine
odds of getting "pure" teammate combos. :o)
I think it was a very great bet. Nice work coming up with the
idea!
Marty
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:nbc7d.17092$kq6.10553690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> 1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
> tough one, even for me)
> 2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
> of what I would like to see though)
> 3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
> 4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
> be caused by one.
> 5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
> better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN,
etc…)
1. no -1
2. dodge was not the fewest, ford had the same -1
3. three, +1
4. no big one -1
5. ug my brain hurts… yates for One, Hendrick TL in front of JJ Two,
Evernham Three +1
Total -1
I scored you to finish things up, peer review welcome.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Somebody wrote:
> "Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:nbc7d.17092$kq6.10553690@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
>>1. Jamie McMurray will get his first win of the year (okay, that was a
>>tough one, even for me)
>>2. Dodges will have the fewest number of cars in the top ten (opposite
>>of what I would like to see though)
>>3. There will be 5 or fewer championship chasers in the top ten.
>>4. The big one (10+ cars) will take out 2 champions chasers but won’t
>>be caused by one.
>>5. In at least 3 cases non chase teammates will finish as well or
>>better than their chaser countersparts (ie. MW/DEJr, BL/TS, RW/RN,
> etc…)
> 1. no -1
> 2. dodge was not the fewest, ford had the same -1
> 3. three, +1
> 4. no big one -1
> 5. ug my brain hurts… yates for One, Hendrick TL in front of JJ Two,
> Evernham Three +1
> Total -1
> I scored you to finish things up, peer review welcome.
thanks Russ… I’ve had a tough week so I wasn’t able to get to the
computer… sorry.
"Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:wXv8d.17071$g%5.4605096@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net…
> Somebody wrote:
> > "Julia" <julia.dmbangel2…@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > Total -1
> > I scored you to finish things up, peer review welcome.
> thanks Russ… I’ve had a tough week so I wasn’t able to get to the
> computer… sorry.
No problem Julia, we all have that happen sometimes.When we get down to only
1 or 2 scores missing it’s nice to just finish it off so I will sometimes
score them myself.
-Russ.