On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:57:28 GMT, anno…@net.spammers <127.0….@bestweb.net> wrote:
>they used them on the oval tonight and
>they worked pretty damn good.
Was that on the main track or the little 1/4 mile on the front stretch?
John
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:57:28 GMT, anno…@net.spammers <127.0….@bestweb.net> wrote:
>they used them on the oval tonight and
>they worked pretty damn good.
Was that on the main track or the little 1/4 mile on the front stretch?
John
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Powered by WordPress
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 01:47:28 GMT, anno…@net.spammers <127.0….@bestweb.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:20:38 CST, igop…@ix.netcom.com (pogo) wrote:
>>On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:57:28 GMT, anno…@net.spammers <127.0….@bestweb.net> wrote:
>>>they used them on the oval tonight and
>>>they worked pretty damn good.
>>Was that on the main track or the little 1/4 mile on the front stretch?
>>John
>The legends track, the little cutout on the frontstretch & pits.
OK, that’s what I expected. You’ve got some run off area there on the outside of
the curves. Problem with using them on a normal oval is that no matter how good
the tires are, there’s going to be more sliding around than usual, and that means
more contact with the wall.
> I have no
>delusion of NASCAR ever using them on an oval, but it provided a test of how
>they could work when cornering for a road course.
That shouldn’t be a real big question. WC cars aren’t that much different from
what was running as Trans-Am a few years back (in terms of size, weight, and
power), so Goodyear should have some decent data to start with.
John
Comment by admin — December 31, 2009 @ 5:14 pm