Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points leader,
almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race and
ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
I guess just a bad break.
March 10, 2010
Fixing races?
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
On 15 May 2005 00:20:01 GMT, Avalanche <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an #%%. But Johnson, big points leader,
>almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race and
>ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
>I guess just a bad break.
That’s how I see it. NASCAR doesn’t have to manufacture breakdowns
for drivers–nor can I imagine a driver volunteering to have a
breakdown for the sake of the Corporation.
They know what’s good for NASCAR is good for them,
but what’s good for them is good for them, too, if you
see what I mean. ;o)
Marty
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am
"Avalanche" <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:st4d81the9tuo3enfkuuo8bjsjp5h2nfar@4ax.com…
> Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points leader,
> almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race and
> ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
> I guess just a bad break.
Were you actually watching the race, or did you just make that up?
-Russ.
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am
"Avalanche" <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:st4d81the9tuo3enfkuuo8bjsjp5h2nfar@4ax.com…
> Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points leader,
> almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race and
> ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
The new final 10 race,"Chase" makes that kind of "fix" totally unnecessary.
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am
On 15 May 2005 01:30:20 GMT, "Somebody" <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote:
>"Avalanche" <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:st4d81the9tuo3enfkuuo8bjsjp5h2nfar@4ax.com…
>> Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points leader,
>> almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race and
>> ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
>> I guess just a bad break.
>Were you actually watching the race, or did you just make that up?
I went downstairs and caught the second half of the race, along with
replays.
JJ was spun by the 77.
Now we have to ask how much it would take to motivate the
77 to spin the uncrowned Champion.
Nah. It still don’t make sense to me. ;o)
Marty
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am
"Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <mole…@canisius.edu> wrote in
news:52jd811724238asnemu4tsuevdljpgg1qv@4ax.com:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> On 15 May 2005 01:30:20 GMT, "Somebody"
> <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote:
>>"Avalanche" <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:st4d81the9tuo3enfkuuo8bjsjp5h2nfar@4ax.com…
>>> Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points
>>> leader, almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight race
>>> and ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
>>> I guess just a bad break.
>>Were you actually watching the race, or did you just make that up?
> I went downstairs and caught the second half of the race, along with
> replays.
> JJ was spun by the 77.
> Now we have to ask how much it would take to motivate the
> 77 to spin the uncrowned Champion.
> Nah. It still don’t make sense to me. ;o)
The 77 spinning him wouldn’t have put him out, it was the
hard left turn into the inside wall half a lap later that
caused the permanent damage. I very much doubt NASCAR could
convince any driver to intentionally run their car into the
wall…those deals tend to hurt.
John
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
John McCoy wrote:
> "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <mole…@canisius.edu> wrote in
> news:52jd811724238asnemu4tsuevdljpgg1qv@4ax.com:
> > On 15 May 2005 01:30:20 GMT, "Somebody"
> > <someb…@nospam.russdoucet.com> wrote:
> >>"Avalanche" <bradleesnowScratchT…@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:st4d81the9tuo3enfkuuo8bjsjp5h2nfar@4ax.com…
> >>> Tell me I’m just a cynic, not an ass. But Johnson, big points
> >>> leader, almost always top 10, NASCAR blooming and wants tight
race
> >>> and ratings, and he wrecks. Finish 40 or so and race tightens.
> >>> I guess just a bad break.
> >>Were you actually watching the race, or did you just make that up?
> > I went downstairs and caught the second half of the race, along
with
> > replays.
> > JJ was spun by the 77.
> > Now we have to ask how much it would take to motivate the
> > 77 to spin the uncrowned Champion.
> > Nah. It still don’t make sense to me. ;o)
> The 77 spinning him wouldn’t have put him out, it was the
> hard left turn into the inside wall half a lap later that
> caused the permanent damage. I very much doubt NASCAR could
> convince any driver to intentionally run their car into the
> wall…those deals tend to hurt.
> John
It was an involuntary turn – his steering broke.
N.
Comment by admin — March 10, 2010 @ 3:30 am